37.6 C
Saturday, August 8, 2020

    Qatar’s Emir signs new cybercrime legislation into law


    With reporting from Riham Sheble

    Qatar’s Emir has approved a controversial new cybercrime law that would punish anyone who creates and shares online content that’s deemed harmful to the country’s “social values” or “general order.”

    The wide-ranging law, which specifies fines and jail time for various offenses, also covers acts that are already illegal in Qatar, including hacking into government networks, distributing child pornography and online fraud.

    But it is the new so-called content crimes – which were previously mentioned when the law was circulated in draft form – that are drawing the most attention, raising fears about its potential impact on journalism and social media commentary in Qatar.

    As part of the new cybercrime law, which was published in Arabic in its entirety by Al Raya, it is illegal to:

    • Create or manage a website to spread false news in order to jeopardize the safety of the state, its general order and its local or international peace (penalty: up to three years in prison and/or a maximum fine of QR500,000);
    • Spread, air or publish the false news with the same intentions (penalty: up to one year in prison and/or a maximum fine of QR250,000);
    • Violate any social values or principles, or publish news, pictures, audio or video recordings related to the personal or family life of individuals – even if it is true (penalty: up to a year in prison and/or a maximum fine of QR100,000);
    • Libel or slander another person online or by using IT equipment (penalty: up to a year in prison and/or a maximum fine of QR100,000).

    Along with creating the actual content, it’s also a crime under the new law to incite, aid and facilitate the publication of offensive material. It’s not clear how inclusive those terms are, especially when social media platforms are designed for content to be retweeted and shared.

    The law also requires telecommunications providers – which right now are Ooredoo and Vodafone – to comply with all prosecutorial requests for evidence.

    Service providers must also “block any websites or links when asked by judicial entities.They have to keep users information for a year and temporarily keep record of electronic information, traffic data or content information for 90 days that can be renewed at the request of the investigating entity.”

    Many of the law’s provisions were included in the final version of the legislation despite the protests of local and foreign critics.

    Matt J. Duffy, a visiting assistant professor at Berry College, told Doha News that the new law leaves much discretion in the hands of authorities:

    “We’ll have to see how the Qatar government chooses to use the new powers enacted with the legislation. Hopefully the government won’t use the law to squelch impartial news reporting or social media speech that merely offers dissent and debate on issues of public importance.”

    Taking issue

    The broadly worded restrictions on publishing “false news,” as well as truthful content about an individual’s “private or family life,” have been criticized for potentially limiting freedom of speech in a country that is home to one of the largest news outlets in the Middle East, the Al Jazeera Media Network.

    The released provisions of the law do not explicitly define what constitutes a violation of the country’s social values or what content poses a threat to the state’s security.

    That leaves it up to authorities to decide whether to use the new powers to prosecute residents who make the odd controversial comment on social media, or to apply the law only to groups and individuals who pose a serious threat to the government’s authority.

    Several media experts contacted by Doha News today were not immediately available to discuss the law.

    But last year, when the draft law was floated to the public, then-director of the Doha Center for Media Freedom Jan Keulen criticized it for blurring cybercrime and freedom of expression on the internet.

    Rather than restricting online express, “this freedom should be guaranteed,” he told Doha News. (Keulen was fired from his position last December.)

    Internationally, media advocacy organization Reporters Without Borders dropped Qatar several spots in its annual press freedom ranking this year because of its concerns that the cybercrime law would further restrict online expression.

    Similarly, the US-based Committee to Protect Journalists sent a letter last year to then-Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim Al Thani, stating:

    “Countries throughout the Middle East and beyond look to Qatar as a media leader in recognition of your constitution, which guarantees freedom of expression and freedom of press, and in light of Al-Jazeera’s ambitious and expanding global reach…

    Qatar should affirm its position as a global media leader by ensuring that the cybercrime bill does not impinge on a free and open Internet, which is a necessary condition for the exercise of press freedom and freedom of expression.”

    Chilling effect

    In a previous interview, Duffy – an expert on journalism and media laws in the Middle East and a visiting assistant professor at Berry College in the US – told Doha News that provisions in Qatar’s law are problematic.

    “There is no country with a good press freedom ranking that has a false news law on the books. The only result is that it has is impeding good journalism.”

    Duffy argued that while reporters attempt to be accurate in their accounts, making the publication of “false news” a crime could lead to self-censorship. The norm within the journalism industry to attribute information to sources – who may or may not be truthful in their accounts – makes such demands impossible, he said.

    Meanwhile, provisions that prevent reporting on issues that are harmful to the social order are overly broad and have been used elsewhere to limit criticism and dissent, said Duffy, who formerly worked as a journalism and media ethics professor in the UAE before being sacked suddenly in 2012.

    He pointed to a social media activist in the Emirates who was sentenced to 10 months in prison for tweeting about a trial and criticizing some of the proceedings under a law prohibiting the spread of “any incorrect, inaccurate, or misleading information which may damage the interests of the state or injures its reputation, prestige, or stature.”

    However, few reports of similar cases have emerged in Qatar in recent years.

    Apart from a local resident who apparently landed in trouble for insulting an ambassador over Facebook, the most notable exception is Qatari poet Mohammed Rashid al-Ajami.

    Al-Ajami – who goes by the name Mohammed Ibn Al-Dheeb in his poetry – was sentenced to 15 years in prison last fall after being allegedly provoked into presenting a poem indirectly critical of this country’s ruling family.

    His words were recorded on YouTube, which resulted in a conviction for inciting the overthrow of the government.

    Will the new law affect your online activities? Thoughts?

    Peter Kovessy
    Peter Kovessy is a reporter with Doha News. Prior to moving to Qatar in 2013, he was the editor of the Ottawa Business Journal in Canada. He holds a Bachelor of Journalism degree from Carleton University.


    1. “There is no country with a good press freedom ranking that has a false news law on the books. The only result is that it has is impeding good journalism.”

      LOL, You have the, and I use the term loosely, newspapers which are nothing but…not sure what you call it and then there’s al jazeera, lapdog for the government ideology.

    2. Jaded, do you actually think that whatever you have published to date hasn’t been read? That your telephone calls and text messages aren’t accessible to the government? What this does is legitimise what has already been in place for years. The frightening thing is that the wording of this law is so loose that you could be arraigned for almost anything.

      • I refuse to comment on the grounds that it may incriminate me. Sure everything was read, but now it’s easy to go to extreme measures for virtually any comment that could vaguely be interpreted as undesirable. Good luck DN.

    3. How does DN think it will effect their coverage? For eg would the story last month covering the South American lady volunteers not in abaya “Violate social values or principles”? Maybe DN could be in trouble for encouraging, inciting etc etc. I’m genuinely interested to know how DN feels if or how it might change things.

    4. What about all the false headlines and articles in The Peninsula and Gulf Times? The content in those rags is pretty laughable quite often. But it’s so obviously under the government’s thumb that I’m sure they’re safe. Best wishes under this new law for DN and their continued goal of providing interesting, unbiased news content.

    5. What a wonderfully vague law, designed to silence good critical investigative journalism and national debate. Not unique to Qatar of course but a sad indictment that little has been learned from the entire region going up in flames since 2011. Shutting down speech makes things worse not better.

    6. No comment.
      Hold on let me check with my lawyers first to ensure that my comment cannot be misconstrued in anyway.

      A sad day for journalism in Doha.
      Long live DN

    7. I feel sad for those students who set up a website recently to review and comment on doctors and clinics performances in Qatar. I cannot think of any option for them now apart from shutting down their website altogether 🙂

    8. I’d just like to go on record and say that the Government of Qatar is doing a fanstastic job and I really appreciate their efforts to keep the sun shining every day. I would also like to say I hate poetry of any form and I am one content resident. In fact I don’t think things could get any better, so I might as well stop commenting, well except to wish all those in power congrautlations and keep up with the good work!

      • Now that ur comment is “on record”, it just might get u a Qatari Passport or at the least enough funding for a MIMHnews.co where u cud praise Qatar for its brilliant laws and all what its doing for both the welfare of residents (?) and citizens alike.

    9. I’m not in Qatar right now, but do visit. What about those who criticise from afar, then fly in for whatever reason? Could I be tailed and jailed?

    10. What about what we hear on Al jazeera the whole time on the radio ” To be a journalist is not a crime” referring to the imprisonment of Al jazeera journalists in Egypt last year while covering Rabaa incidents!! Does this motto apply only for international news coverage.
      Good luck Doha News

    11. Did this guys who insulted ISLAM as TERRORIST and working now in QATAR Voilated the ANTI-CYBER CRIME LAW or any Laws in QATAR?


    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    All countries
    Total confirmed cases
    Updated on August 8, 2020 10:38 pm

    Related Articles

    - Advertisment -

    Most Read

    Culture minister: Vocal critics welcome in Qatar

    Culture Minister Hamad Bin Abdulaziz Al Kuwari said the only off-limit subjects are those that “offend” Islamic values, according to a statement carried by the government-run Qatar News Agency (QNA).

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.